We are walking in today: Law of the Mind, Part 30, Understanding Kingdom--It Is Time To Elevate The Torah!!
Witness ascend throughout the Bible: H5927 alah --to go up, ascend
Genesis 28:12 And he dreamed, and behold a ladder set up on the earth, and the top of it reached to heaven: and behold the angels of God ascending and descending on it.
Torah: Exodus 19:18
Prophets: Jeremiah 10:13, 51:16; Ezekiel 38:9
Writings: Joshua 6:5, 10:7; Judges 13:20, 20:40; Psalm 24:3, 68:18; Proverbs 30:4
John 6:62 What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?
Matthew 16:19 I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven. Whatever you prohibit on earth will be prohibited in heaven, and whatever you permit on earth will be permitted in heaven.”
The authoritative term spoken too often by the body of believers quoted to bind the acts of the evil one and his kingdom and to lose the authority of Heaven that governs over the spiritual and earthly realm. As we have been taught throughout the churches. Spoken of in the book of Matthew chapter 16. Has once again caused a gross error in its interpretations because of the understanding of those who translated scriptures from the Greek mindset. Not knowing full well that the original context of scripture is from a Hebraic mindset. A Hebrew God speaking to His Hebrew children. Caused this widely spread of belief since the beginning of the Roman conquer of Israel.
When Yeshua spoke of binding and loosing, He wasn’t talking about spiritual warfare. The people to whom He spoke understood that He was talking about what was consistent with Torah and what wasn’t. This matter of binding and loosing wasn’t unique to Yeshua. It was entirely familiar to them all because it was how the rabbis would sanction something or ban it according to the teachings of Torah. Yeshua as the word made flesh (Torah) the master teacher consistently corrected the gross and rigorous teachings of the Rabbi at that time that as well taught with mixed man-made wisdom and Torah principles, that constantly led the Hebrews astray. Hence the many writings of the wisdom of the Rabbis who wrote the “Talmud”. One Rabbi says this and yet another Rabbi says that--as in modern Christian churches, one denomination says this and another says that. When Yeshua was constantly correcting the false teachings of His Torah. Not meaning just the First five books of the Old Testament but the whole bible in Hebrew thought. Every word or parabolic teaching of Yeshua was given an idiom and should be interpreted as an idiom.
Such as:
“Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill” (Matthew 5:17). When He said, “I did not come” or elsewhere “I have come,” have you interpreted that as meaning He was referring to His incarnation? That is not what He meant. “I have come” is an idiom meaning intent or purpose. “It is my purpose” is what He was saying in Matthew 5:17. He is not referring to His coming from heaven but His intent and purpose were to fulfill Torah by raising it to God’s intention for it. It is a major part of His messianic purpose to elevate Torah to the fullest significance and meaning.
Also:
“Bind the devil.” Yeshua did say that the strong man needed to be bound, and we assume He meant the devil (Matthew 12:39; Mark 3:27). Some think that Yeshua bound the strong man (the devil) when He was resurrected from the dead. When we come to Yeshua and are born from above, we become new persons in Him and we are empowered by God to no longer sin. Now we can see sin for what it is which we couldn’t see before we were indwelt by the Holy Spirit. In that sense, the strong man has been bound in the lives of believers and we are free from Hasatan’s power because Yeshua has given us authority over him and his ways. As long as we believe that, and live it out by faith, we are loosed from his grip. It is also true that we have been given the authority in Yeshua’s name to command demons to cease their influence and to leave.
Let’s look again at Matthew 16:19 in a more correct reading. The words “binding and loosing" do not convey what Yeshua meant. Here’s one of those places where a knowledge of Hebrew roots straightens out a whole doctrinal conundrum. The Hebrew for binding is to disallow or forbid, and the Hebrew for losing is to allow or permit. So the verse should read, “I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you forbid on earth shall have been forbidden in heaven, and whatever you permit on earth shall have been permitted in heaven.” Yeshua was saying that binding and loosing or rather permitting and forbidding are directly connected to this issue of authority. Okay, so, what is being forbidden or permitted?
When we read the book of Acts we see incredible power and effectiveness in the lives and relationships of the early believers, all of whom, I might add, were living Torah compliant lives by the Spirit of God. But in the course of time things were incorporated into the doctrines and practices of the church that were apart from Torah. Looking back, we see that the wisdom of men in authority replaced the authority of heaven in the lives of men.
It's all about how to observe Torah …loose meant permit; bind meant to forbid. May I encourage you to study out the matter from a Hebrew understanding. That will cause you to search out scriptures and compare Hebrew the original language, then Greek, then English or whatever language you speak compared to Hebrew. You will find a whole new but not so new understanding of scriptures. Which was the same Kingdom message that The King came to correct?
Black History Moment:
Ludwig Van Beethoven
Ludwig van Beethoven was of African descent, and the truth of his ethnic origins was covered up through a mixture of white powder worn on his face when out in public, the use of body doubles for portraits, and “euro-centric” historians, hiding the truth of his genetic heritage. This is the claim of a new website, that not only alleges that Beethoven’s African roots were well-known to the Viennese elite, who allowed the “illusion” of a white Beethoven to persist after his death, but that the proof of Beethoven's true cultural background is contained within his music. This radical assertion isn’t new: theories have simmered quietly for decades claiming the composer was descended from North African relatives. Rather than basing this conclusion on genealogical studies, however, this claim is often attributed to Beethoven’s familial connections to the Flemish region of northern Europe, which had been invaded and ruled by Spain, a nation with connections to the North African Moor culture. This is often coupled with anecdotal descriptions of Beethoven being nick-named “Spaniard” or “Moor” because of his dark, swarthy complexion, and certain portraits of the composer which appear to show him with very dark skin. However, www.beethovenwasafrican.com is refocusing this old debate to explore the potential cultural clues in the composer’s music. The website claims that within Beethoven's Piano Sonatas are African polyrhythms, that adhering rigidly to the existing scores obscures. According to the site, historical accounts of Beethoven’s performances of his own music offer proof that the written scores do not contain the full, African-influenced character of the composer’s intentions. One unattributed quote cited on the site says, “His extemporizations were the most extraordinary things that one could hear. No artists that I ever heard came at all near the height, which Beethoven attained. The wealth of ideas which forced themselves on him, the caprices to which he surrendered himself, the variety of treatment, the difficulties, were inexhaustible.” In an effort to reveal the alleged intended rhythmic identity of Beethoven’s music, an album, Beethoven was African – Polyrhythmic Piano Sonatas, is available, with artificially computer generated performances of the African-infused interpretations of Beethoven’s Sonatas. While it provides an interesting twist on these well-known classics, the general consensus among musicologists and historians is that Beethoven was not a North African descendant and that any conspiracy to conceal the truth is, in fact, baseless. There are no historical accounts during his lifetime that refer to the composer as black or a “poor”, and the Viennese of the 18th and 19th Centuries were well aware of persons of African descent, referred to at the time as moors and mulattos, such as George Bridgetower, who was a famous violinist and creative collaborator of Beethoven’s.
- See more at: http://www.limelightmagazine.com.au/…/new-website-claims-be…
Shema Selah let us pause and consider this teaching on the kingdom!! Facebook LIVE video
No comments:
Post a Comment